![]() ![]() Camino is newer, and it also appears to be less resource-hungry. Opera 10.63, the last version you can run under Tiger, was released in 2010. Other alternatives, such as an older version of Opera, or the last version of Safari you can run under Panther or Tiger, are simply too old to be useful. So, which is the best alternative when your Mac isn’t powerful enough to smoothly run the excellent TenFourFox? In my opinion, it’s Camino.Ĭamino’s development ceased in 2012. Of these, the only Mac that can (barely) run TenFourFox is the iBook G3/466. A PowerBook G3/400 ‘Lombard’, with 256MB of RAM, running Mac OS X 10.4.11.A graphite clamshell iBook G3/466 SE, with 576MB of RAM, running Mac OS X 10.4.11.A blueberry clamshell iBook G3/300, with 288MB of RAM, running Mac OS X 10.3.9.Although the browser may run under Mac OS X Server, it is not currently supported.įor example, I have three machines I use from time to time: Video playback is likely to be poor on systems slower than 1.25GHz a G5 is recommended. 1GB of RAM and a G4 or G5 processor is strongly recommended. TenFourFox requires a G3 Power Macintosh, Mac OS X 10.4.11, 200MB of free disk space and 512MB of RAM. However, you may have a Mac that barely meets - or doesn’t meet at all - TenFourFox’s minimum system requirements: Every time someone with a vintage G3/G4/G5 PowerPC Mac asks me what browser would be my preferred choice for such systems, I always suggests TenFourFox, because it’s stable, secure, and actively maintained. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |